Western Officials Decry Economic Cost of US-Israel War with Iran at IMF Meeting
The economic repercussions of the US and Israeli-launched war with Iran dominated discussions at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank Spring meetings in Washington DC. Senior Western financial officials voiced considerable apprehension over the global economic costs, particularly as the conflict continues to impact shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves was notably critical of the war, describing it as a 'folly' and a 'mistake' that was 'not ours'. This sentiment was widely shared among G7 finance ministers and central bankers, who expressed concern about the world bearing the 'inadvertent but predictable costs' of the conflict, which began on 28 February with strikes that killed Iran's Supreme Leader and hundreds of civilians, including 110 children at a primary school.
The US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, however, projected short-term confidence, dismissing concerns over market and economic recovery. This contrasted sharply with the worries of Asian financiers over 'real shortages of energy'. Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne warned that the impact on world energy would be a risk 'for years to come', even after the conflict concludes.
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva characterised the situation as a 'slower moving shock', while World Bank President Ajay Banga highlighted the severe impact on economically poorer nations. Iraq's oil shipments, critical for 85% of its revenues, have ceased, and countries like Bangladesh face gas supply disruptions. Pacific Island nations, with limited energy storage, are particularly vulnerable due to extended shipping routes.
In response, the World Bank has allocated up to $100 billion in support funds, exceeding its COVID-19 lockdown relief, to assist developing countries with escalating energy and food prices. Georgieva cautioned that 'April is likely to be even tougher' as earlier shipments exhaust, and new deliveries are delayed by the Strait's closure. The price of urea, a vital fertiliser component, has doubled, signalling potential global food availability issues by June or July, particularly for non-northern hemisphere planting seasons.
Secretary Bessent defended the US policy, framing 'a small bit of economic pain for a few weeks' as necessary for 'long-term security', linking it to an Iranian launch targeting Diego Garcia. He maintained a bullish stance on the US blockade of Iran and prospects for negotiations. French Finance Minister Roland Lescure underscored the Strait as the 'knot of this crisis' and a significant cost to all, including the US through higher petrol prices, which Iran leverages as a 'weapon of deterrence'.
The UK is also recalibrating its energy policy, with Chancellor Reeves exploring increased North Sea production and reforms to decouple electricity prices from gas costs. Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey advised against immediate interest rate hikes, advocating 'de-escalation' as the primary method to combat inflation stemming from the war. While the recent, albeit temporary, reopening of the Strait of Hormuz saw a dip in energy prices and borrowing costs, the broader economic outlook remains precarious.
