Woman claims 'medical misogyny' led to delayed diagnosis for severe pain
Patient alleges 'medical misogyny' in NHS
Rachel, who prefers not to disclose her surname, experienced escalating pain after a routine colonoscopy identified an indentation in her abdomen. Despite her growing discomfort and the appearance of a 'great big mound', her concerns were reportedly dismissed by medical professionals who, she claims, encouraged her to 'just get on with it'.
Upon developing a fever and intensified pain, Rachel returned to hospital. Her suggestion of an ovarian cyst was initially acknowledged but not acted upon. Subsequent attempts to secure a gynaecological referral were diverted, leading to a misdiagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which was later rejected.
Discharged with antibiotics, Rachel reviewed her medical records, identifying overlooked findings on CT scans indicative of widespread abdominal inflammation. She recounted feeling 'I wasn't anyone's patient' as various departments declined responsibility for her care, despite her persistent emphasis on reproductive organ concerns.
Following private medical treatment, Rachel was finally diagnosed with adenomyosis, a painful condition involving the uterine lining. She highlighted an 'overwhelming' response from other women who shared similar experiences of not being listened to within the healthcare system.
Meeting with the Health Secretary
Rachel's case was raised in the House of Commons by her MP, Josh Dean, leading to a meeting with Health Secretary Wes Streeting. Rachel stated that Mr Streeting 'doesn't need convincing' of the issue and is actively working on 'establishing more pathways and structures to enable women to get the care they need for these gynaecological conditions'.
A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care acknowledged that the NHS has 'let women and girls down for too long'. They affirmed the government's commitment through a renewed Women's Health Strategy, the introduction of a menopause question in NHS Health Checks, Martha's Rule for urgent reviews, and efforts to reduce gynaecological waiting lists.
